" DISCLAIMER: The ILO does not take responsibility for content presented on this web portal that is presented in any language other than English, which is the language used for the initial production and peer-review of original content. Certain statistics have not been updated since the production of the 4th edition of the Encyclopaedia (1998)."

Thursday, 10 March 2011 16:55

Psychosocial Characteristics of the Workforce in On-Shore Fish Processing

Written by
Rate this item
(0 votes)

On-shore fish processing includes a variety of activities. The range is from small, low-technology fish processing, like drying or smoking of local catch for the local market, to the large, high-technology modern factory, producing highly specialized products that are consumer packed for an international market. In this article the discussion is limited to industrial fish processing. The level of technology is an important factor for the psychosocial environment in industrialized fish-processing plants. This influences the organization of work tasks, the wage systems, the control and monitoring mechanisms and the opportunities for the employees to have influence on their work and the corporate policy. Another important aspect when discussing psychosocial characteristics of the workforce in the on-shore fish-processing industry is the division of labour by sex, which is widespread in the industry. This means that men and women are assigned to different work tasks according to their sex and not to their skills.

In fish-processing plants, some departments are characterized by high technology and high degree of specialization, while others might use less advanced technology and be more flexible in their organization. The departments characterized by a high degree of specialization are, as a rule, those with a predominantly female workforce, while the departments where the work tasks are less specialized are those with a predominantly male workforce. This is based on an idea that certain work tasks are either fit for males only or females only. Tasks seen as fit only for males will have higher status than the tasks done by female workers only. Consequently, men will be unwilling to do “women’s work”, while most women are eager to do “men’s work” if allowed to. Higher status will also as a rule mean higher salary and better opportunities for advancement (Husmo and Munk-Madsen 1994; Skaptadóttir 1995).

A typical high-technology department is the production department, where the workers are lined up around the conveyor belt, cutting or packing fish fillets. The psychosocial environment is characterized by monotonous and repetitive tasks and a low degree of social interaction among the workers. The wage system is based on individual performance (bonus system), and individual workers are monitored by computer systems in addition to the supervisor. This causes high stress levels, and this type of work also increases the risk of developing strain-related syndromes among the workers. The workers’ restriction to the conveyor belt also reduces the possibilities for informal communication with the management in order to influence corporate policy and/or promote one’s self for a raise or a promotion (Husmo and Munk-Madsen 1994). Since the workers of highly specialized departments learn only a limited number of tasks, these are the most likely to be sent home when the production is reduced due to temporary lack of raw material or due to market problems. These are also the ones that are most likely to be replaced by machines or industrial robots as new technology is introduced (Husmo and Søvik 1995).

An example of a department of lower technology levels is the raw material department, where workers drive trucks and fork-lifts at the pier, unload, sort and wash the fish. Here we often find high flexibility in the work tasks, and the workers do different jobs throughout the day. The wage system is based on an hourly rate, and individual performance is not measured by computers, reducing stress and contributing to a more relaxed atmosphere. Variation in work tasks stimulates teamwork and improves the psycho- social environment in many ways. The social interactions increase, and the risk of strain-related syndromes is reduced. Possibilities for promotion increase, since learning a wider range of work tasks makes the workers more qualified for higher positions. Flexibility allows informal communication with the management/supervisor in order to influence corporate policy and individual promotion (Husmo 1993; Husmo and Munk-Madsen 1994).

The general trend is that the level of processing technology increases, leading to more specialization and automation in the fish-processing industry. This has consequences for the psychosocial environment of the workers as outlined above. The division of labour by sex means that the psychosocial environment for most women is worse than it is for men. The fact that women have the work tasks that are the most likely to be replaced by robots adds an additional dimension to this discussion, as it limits the work opportunities for women in general. In some cases these implications might apply not only to female workers, but also to lower social classes in the workforce or even to different races (Husmo 1995).

 

Back

Read 2113 times Last modified on Tuesday, 28 June 2011 08:59

Contents

Preface
Part I. The Body
Part II. Health Care
Part III. Management & Policy
Part IV. Tools and Approaches
Part V. Psychosocial and Organizational Factors
Part VI. General Hazards
Part VII. The Environment
Part VIII. Accidents and Safety Management
Part IX. Chemicals
Part X. Industries Based on Biological Resources
Agriculture and Natural Resources Based Industries
Beverage Industry
Fishing
Resources
Food Industry
Forestry
Hunting
Livestock Rearing
Lumber
Paper and Pulp Industry
Part XI. Industries Based on Natural Resources
Part XII. Chemical Industries
Part XIII. Manufacturing Industries
Part XIV. Textile and Apparel Industries
Part XV. Transport Industries
Part XVI. Construction
Part XVII. Services and Trade
Part XVIII. Guides

Fishing Additional Resources

Click the Button below to view additional resources for this topic.

button

Fishing References

Alverson, DL, MH Freeberg, SA Murawski, and JG Pope. 1994. A Global Assessment of Fisheries Bycatch and Discards. Rome: FAO.

Anderson, DM. 1994. Red tides. Sci Am 271:62–68.

Chiang, H-C, Y-C Ko, S-S Chen, H-S Yu, T-N Wu, and P-Y Chang. 1993. Prevalence of shoulder and upper-limb disorders among workers in the fish-processing industry. Scand J Work Environment and Health 19:126–131.

Cura, NM. 1995. Treading on dangerous waters. Samudra 13:19–23.

Dayton, PK, SF Thrush, MT Agardy, and RF Hofman. 1995. Environmental effects of marine fishing. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 5:205–232.

Dyer, CL. 1988. Social organization as a function of work. Organization aboard a Japanese surimi trawler. Journal of the Society for Applied Anthropology 47:76–81.

Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. 1992. Review of the State of World Fishery Resources. Part 1: Marine resources. Rome: FAO.

—. 1993. Marine Fisheries and the Law of the Sea: A Decade of Change. Rome: FAO.

—. 1995. The State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Rome: FAO.

Food and Nutrition Board. 1991. Seafood Safety. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Gales, R. 1993. Co-operative Mechanisms for the Conservation of Albatross. Australia: Australian Nature Conservation Agency.

Hagmar, L, K Lindén, A Nilsson, B Norrving, B Åkesson, A Schütz, and T Möller. 1992. Cancer incidence and mortality among Swedish Baltic Sea fishermen. Scand J Work Environ Health 18:217–224.

Husmo, M. 1993. Drømmen om å bli fiskekjøper. Om rekruttering til ledelse og kvinners lederstil i norsk fiskeindustri, Rap. No. 8. Tromsø, Norway: Fiskeriforskning/Norges fiskerihøgskole, Universitetet i Tromsø.

—. 1995. Institusjonell endring eller ferniss? Kvalitetsstyringsprosessen i noen norske fiskeindustribedrifter, Rap. No. 1. Tromsø, Norway: Norges fiskerihøgskole/Seksjon for fiskeriorganisasjon.

Husmo, M and E Munk-Madsen. 1994. Kjønn som kvalifikasjon i fiskeindustrien. In Leve Kysten? Strandhogg i fiskeri-Norge, edited by O Otterstad and S Jentoft. Norway: Ad Notam Glydenal.

Husmo, M and G Søvik. 1995. Ledelsesstrukturen i norsk fiskeforedlingsindustri. Rap. No. 2. Tromsø, Norway: Norges fiskerihøgskole/Seksjon for fiskeriorganisasjon.

Kolare, S. 1993. Strategies for prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (consensus paper). Int J of Ind Ergonomics 11:77–81.

Moore, SRW. 1969. The mortality and morbidity of deep sea fishermen sailing from Grimsby in one year. Br J Ind Med 26:25–46.

Munk-Madsen, E. 1990. Skibet er ladet med køn. En analyse af kønrelationer og kvinders vilkår i fabriksskibsflåden. Tromsø, Norway: Norwegian College of Fisheries Science, University of Tromsø.

Ohlsson, K, GÅ Hansson, I Balogh, U Strömberg, B Pålsson, C Nordander, L Rylander, and S Skerfving. 1994. Disorders of the neck and upper limbs in women in the fish processing industry. Occup and Envir Med 51:826–32.

Ólafsdóttir, H and V Rafnsson. 1997. Increase in musculoskeletal symptoms of upper limbs among women after introduction of the flow-line in fish-fillet plants. Int J Ind Erg, in press.

Rafnsson, V and H Gunnarsdóttir. 1992. Fatal accidents among Icelandic seamen: 1966–1986. Br J Ind Med 49:694–699.

—. 1993. Risk of fatal accidents occurring other than at sea among Icelandic seamen. Br Med J 306:1379-1381.

—. 1994. Mortality among Icelandic seamen. Int J Epidemiol 23:730–736.

—. 1995. Cancer incidence among seamen in Iceland. Am J Ind Med 27:187–193.

Reilley, MSJ. 1985. Mortality from occupational accidents to United Kingdom fishermen 1961–1980. Br J Ind Med 42:806–814.

Skaptadóttir, UD. 1995. Fishermen’s Wives and Fish Processors: Continuity and Change in Women’s Position in Icelandic Fishing Villages, 1870–1990. Ph.D. thesis. New York: University of New York.

Stroud, C. 1996. The ethics and politics of whaling. In The Conservation of Whales and Dolphins: Science and Practice, edited by MP Simmons, and JD Hutchinson. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Svenson, B-G, Z Mikoczy, U Strömberg, and L Hagmar. 1995. Mortality and cancer incidence among Swedish fishermen with a high dietary intake of persistent organochlorine compounds. Scand J Work Environ Health 21:106–115.

Törner, M, G Blide, H Eriksson, R Kadefors, R Karlsson, and I Petersen. 1988. Musculo-skeletal symptoms as related to working conditions among Swedish professional fishermen. Applied Ergonomics 19: 191–201.

Vacher, J. 1994. Be strong by being together. Samudra 10 and 11 (special supplement).

World Health Organization (WHO). 1985. Identification and Control of Work-related Diseases. Technical Report Series No. 714. Geneva: WHO.