" DISCLAIMER: The ILO does not take responsibility for content presented on this web portal that is presented in any language other than English, which is the language used for the initial production and peer-review of original content. Certain statistics have not been updated since the production of the 4th edition of the Encyclopaedia (1998)."

Saturday, 26 February 2011 20:48

Rubber Tree Cultivation

Written by
Rate this item
(6 votes)

Natural rubber (cis-1,4-polyisoprene) is a processed plant product that can be isolated from several hundred species of trees and plants in many areas of the world, including the equatorial regions of Africa, Southeast Asia and South America. The milky sap, or latex, of the commercial rubber tree Hevea brasiliensis provides essentially all (more than 99%) of the world’s supply of natural rubber. Natural rubber is also produced from Ficus elastica and other African plants in production areas such as Côte d’Ivoire, Madagascar, Senegal and Sierra Leone. Natural trans-1,4-polyisoprene is known as gutta-percha, or balata, and comes from trees in South America and Indonesia. This produces a less pure rubber than the cis isomer. Another potential source of commercial natural rubber production is the guayule shrub, Parthenium argentatum, which grows in hot, arid regions, such as the southwestern United States.

Production of Hevea rubber is divided between plantations larger than 100 acres and small farms, typically less than 10 acres. The productivity of commercial rubber trees has increased regularly since the 1970s. This increased productivity is due primarily to the development and replanting of acreage with faster maturing, higher yielding trees. The use of chemical fertilizers and the control of rubber tree diseases have also contributed to the increased productivity. Strict measures for the control of exposures to herbicides and pesticides during storage, mixing and spraying, the use of appropriate protective clothing and barrier creams, and the provision of change rooms and appropriate medical surveillance can effectively control the hazards associated with the use of agricultural chemicals.

Rubber trees are usually tapped for latex by making a spiral cut through the bark of the tree on alternate days, although the frequency and method of tapping vary. The latex is collected in cups hung on the tree below the cuts. The contents of the cups are transferred to large containers and moved to processing stations. Ammonia is usually added as a preservative. Ammonia disrupts the particles of rubber and produces a two-phase product consisting of 30 to 40% solids. This product is further concentrated to 60% solids, resulting in ammoniated latex concentrate, which contains 1.6% ammonia by weight. A low-ammonia latex concentrate (0.15 to 0.25% ammonia) is also available. The low-ammonia concentrate requires the addition of a secondary preservative to the latex to avoid coagulation and contamination. Secondary preservatives include sodium pentachlorophenate, tetramethylthiuram disulphide, sodium dimethyldithiocarbamate and zinc oxide.

The chief hazards to field workers are exposure to the elements, animal and insect bites and hazards related to the sharp tools used to make incisions in the trees. Injuries that result should be treated promptly to reduce the risk of infection. Preventive and therapeutic measures can reduce the hazards of the climate and pests. The incidences of malaria and gastro-enteric diseases have been reduced on modern plantations through prophylaxis, mosquito control and sanitary measures.

The guayule shrub, a native plant of southern Texas and north central Mexico, contains natural rubber in its stems and roots. The whole shrub must be harvested for the rubber to be extracted.

Guayule rubber is essentially identical to Hevea rubber, except that guayule rubber has less green strength. Guayule rubber is not a viable commercial alternative to Hevea rubber at this time.

Types of Natural Rubber

The types of natural rubber currently produced include ribbed smoked sheets, technically specified rubber, crepes, latex, epoxidized natural rubber and thermoplastic natural rubber. Thailand is the biggest supplier of ribbed smoked sheets, which accounts for about half of world natural rubber production. Technically specified rubber, or block natural rubber, was introduced in Malaysia in the mid-1960s, and accounts for about 40 to 45% of natural rubber production. Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand are the largest suppliers of technically specified rubber. Technically specified rubber derives its name from the fact that its quality is determined by technical specifications, primarily its purity and elasticity, rather than by conventional visual specifications. Crepe rubber now accounts for only a small part of the world natural rubber market. Worldwide consumption of natural rubber latex has recently risen, primarily due to increased demand for latex products as a barrier to the human immunodeficiency virus and other blood-borne pathogens. Latex concentrates are used for the production of adhesives, carpet backing, foam and dipped products. Dipped products include balloons, gloves and condoms. Epoxidized natural rubber is produced by treating natural rubber with peracids. Epoxidized natural rubber is used as a replacement for some synthetic rubbers. Thermoplastic natural rubber results from the partial dynamic vulcanization of blends of polyolefins and natural rubber. It is in the early stages of commercial development.

Production Processes

Latex from rubber trees is either shipped to consumers as a concentrate or processed further into dry rubber (see figure 1 and figure 2). For technically specified rubber, one manufacturing process involves coagulating the field latex with acid and passing the coagulated latex through cutting machines and a series of creping rollers. Hammer mills or granulators convert the product to rubber crumbs, which are screened, washed, dried, baled and packed. Another method of technically specified rubber production involves the addition of a crumbling agent before coagulation, followed by crumbling using creping rollers.

Figure 1. Rubber tree tapper coagulating collected latex by first gathering it on a stick and then holding it over a bowl of smoke

RUB020F1

Figure 2. Processing rubber on a plantation in Eastern Cameroon

RUB020F2

Ribbed smoked sheets are produced by passing coagulated latex through a series of rollers to produce thin sheets, which are embossed with a ribbed pattern. The ribbed pattern serves mainly to increase the surface area of the material and aid its drying. The sheets are preserved by placing them in a smokehouse at 60ºC for a week, visually graded, sorted and packed in bales.

Compounding formulas used for natural rubbers are essentially the same as those used for most of the unsaturated synthetic rubbers. Accelerators, activators, antioxidants, fillers, softeners and vulcanizing agents may all be required, depending upon what properties are desired in the finished compound.

The hazards arising from the use of mechanized production methods (i.e., rolls and centrifuges) require strict safety controls during installation, use and maintenance, including attention to machine guarding. Appropriate precautions must be used when processing chemicals are used. Attention should be paid to the use of appropriate walking and working surfaces to prevent slips, trips and falls. Employees should receive training in safe work practices. Strict supervision is required to prevent accidents associated with the use of heat as an aid in curing.

 

Back

Read 12500 times Last modified on Monday, 05 September 2011 00:57
More in this category: « General Profile Tyre Manufacturing »

Contents

Preface
Part I. The Body
Part II. Health Care
Part III. Management & Policy
Part IV. Tools and Approaches
Part V. Psychosocial and Organizational Factors
Part VI. General Hazards
Part VII. The Environment
Part VIII. Accidents and Safety Management
Part IX. Chemicals
Part X. Industries Based on Biological Resources
Part XI. Industries Based on Natural Resources
Part XII. Chemical Industries
Chemical Processing
Oil and Natural Gas
Pharmaceutical Industry
Rubber Industry
Resources
Part XIII. Manufacturing Industries
Part XIV. Textile and Apparel Industries
Part XV. Transport Industries
Part XVI. Construction
Part XVII. Services and Trade
Part XVIII. Guides

Rubber Industry Additional Resources

Click the Button below to view additional resources for this topic.

button

Rubber Industry References

American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). 1995. Industrial Ventilation: A Manual of Recommended Practice, 22nd ed. Cincinnati: OH: ACGIH.

Andjelkovich, D, JD Taulbee, and MJ Symons. 1976. Mortality experience in a cohort of rubber workers, 1964–1973. J Occup Med 18:386–394.

Andjelkovich, D, H Abdelghany, RM Mathew, and S Blum. 1988. Lung cancer case-control study in a rubber manufacturing plant. Am J Ind Med 14:559–574.

Arp, EW, PH Wolf, and H Checkoway. 1983. Lymphocytic leukemia and exposures to benzene and other solvents in the rubber industry. J Occup Med 25:598–602.

Bernardinelli, L, RD Marco, and C Tinelli. 1987. Cancer mortality in an Italian rubber factory. Br J Ind Med 44:187–191.

Blum, S, EW Arp, AH Smith, and HA Tyroler. 1979. Stomach cancer among rubber workers: An epidemiologic investigation. In Dusts and Disease. Park Forest, IL: SOEH, Pathotox Publishers.

Checkoway, H, AH Smith, AJ McMichael, FS Jones, RR Monson, and HA Tyroler. 1981. A case-control study of bladder cancer in the U.S. tire industry. Br J Ind Med 38:240–246.

Checkoway, H, T Wilcosky, P Wolf, and H Tyroler. 1984. An evaluation of the associations of leukemia and rubber industry solvent exposures. Am J Ind Med 5:239–249.

Delzell, E and RR Monson. 1981a. Mortality among rubber workers. III. Cause-specific mortality 1940–1978. J Occup Med 23:677–684.

—. 1981b. Mortality among rubber workers. IV. General mortality patterns. J Occup Med 23:850–856.

Delzell, E, D Andjelkovich, and HA Tyroler. 1982. A case-control study of employment experience and lung cancer among rubber workers. Am J Ind Med 3:393–404.

Delzell, E, N Sathiakumar, M Hovinga, M Macaluso, J Julian, R Larson, P Cole, and DCF Muir. 1996. A follow-up study of synthetic rubber workers. Toxicology 113:182–189.

Fajen, J, RA Lunsford, and DR Roberts. 1993. Industrial exposure to 1,3-butadiene in monomer, polymer and end-user industries. In Butadiene and Styrene: Assessment of Health Hazards, edited by M Sorsa, K Peltonen, H Vainio and K Hemminki. Lyon: IARC Scientific Publications.

Fine, LJ and JM Peters. 1976a. Respiratory morbidity in rubber workers. I. Prevalence of respiratory symptoms and disease in curing workers. Arch Environ Health 31:5–9.

—. 1976b. Respiratory morbidity in rubber workers. II. Pulmonary function in curing workers. Arch Environ Health 31:10–14.

—. 1976c. Studies of respiratory morbidity in rubber workers. III. Respiratory morbidity in processing workers. Arch Environ Health 31:136–140.

Fine, LJ, JM Peters, WA Burgess, and LJ DiBerardinis. 1976. Studies of respiratory morbidity in rubber workers. IV. Respiratory morbidity in talc workers. Arch Environ Health 31:195–200.

Fox, AJ and PF Collier. 1976. A survey of occupational cancer in the rubber and cablemaking industries: Analysis of deaths occurring in 1972–74. Br J Ind Med 33:249–264.

Fox, AJ, DC Lindars, and R Owen. 1974. A survey of occupational cancer in the rubber and cablemaking industries: Results of a five-year analysis, 1967–71. Br J Ind Med 31:140–151.

Gamble, JF and R Spirtas. 1976. Job classification and utilization of complete work histories in occupational epidemiology. J Occup Med 18:399–404.

Goldsmith, D, AH Smith, and AJ McMichael. 1980. A case-control study of prostate cancer within a cohort of rubber and tire workers. J Occup Med 22:533–541.

Granata, KP and WS Marras. 1993. An EMG-assisted model of loads on the lumbar spine during asymmetric trunk extensions. J Biomech 26:1429–1438.

Greek, BF. 1991. Rubber demand is expected to grow after 1991. C & EN (13 May): 37-54.

Gustavsson, P, C Hogstedt, and B Holmberg. 1986. Mortality and incidence of cancer among Swedish rubber workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 12:538–544.

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). 1992. 1,3-Butadiene. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Occupational Exposures to Mists and Vapours from Strong Inorganic Acids and Other Industrial Chemicals. Lyon: IARC.

International Institute of Synthetic Rubber Producers. 1994. Worldwide Rubber Statistics. Houston, TX: International Institute of Synthetic Rubber Producers.

Kilpikari, I. 1982. Mortality among male rubber workers in Finland. Arch Environ Health 37:295–299.

Kilpikari, I, E Pukkala, M Lehtonen, and M Hakama. 1982. Cancer incidence among Finnish rubber workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 51:65–71.

Lednar, WM, HA Tyroler, AJ McMichael, and CM Shy. 1977. The occupational determinants of chronic disabling pulmonary disease in rubber workers. J Occup Med 19:263–268.

Marras, WS and CM Sommerich. 1991. A three dimensional motion model of loads on the lumbar spine, Part I: Model structure. Hum Factors 33:123–137.

Marras, WS, SA Lavender, S Leurgans, S Rajulu, WG Allread, F Fathallah, and SA Ferguson. 1993. The role of dynamic three dimensional trunk motion in occupationally-related low back disorders: The effects of workplace factors, trunk position and trunk motion characteristics on injury. Spine 18:617–628.

Marras, WS, SA Lavender, S Leurgans, F Fathallah, WG Allread, SA Ferguson, and S Rajulu. 1995. Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorder risk. Ergonomics 35:377–410.

McMichael, AJ, DA Andjelkovich, and HA Tyroler. 1976. Cancer mortality among rubber workers: An epidemiologic study. Ann NY Acad Sci 271:125–137.

McMichael, AJ, R Spirtas, and LL Kupper. 1974. An epidemiologic study of mortality within a cohort of rubber workers, 1964–72. J Occup Med 16:458–464.

McMichael, AJ, R Spirtas, LL Kupper, and JF Gamble. 1975. Solvent exposures and leukemia among rubber workers: An epidemiologic study. J Occup Med 17:234–239.

McMichael, AJ, R Spirtas, JF Gamble, and PM Tousey. 1976a. Mortality among rubber workers: Relationship to specific jobs. J Occup Med 18:178–185.

McMichael, AJ, WS Gerber, JF Gamble, and WM Lednar. 1976b. Chronic respiratory symptoms and job type within the rubber industry. J Occup Med 18:611–617.

Monson, RR and KK Nakano. 1976a. Mortality among rubber workers. I. White male union employees in Akron, Ohio. Am J Epidemiol 103:284–296.

—. 1976b. Mortality among rubber workers. II. Other employees. Am J Epidemiol 103:297–303.

Monson, RR and LJ Fine. 1978. Cancer mortality and morbidity among rubber workers. J Natl Cancer Inst 61:1047–1053.

National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). 1995. Standard for Ovens and Furnaces. NFPA 86. Quincy, MA: NFPA.

National Joint Industrial Council for the Rubber Manufacturing Industry. 1959. Running Nip Accidents. London: National Joint Industrial Council for the Rubber Manufacturing Industry.

—.1967. Safe Working of Calenders. London: National Joint Industrial Council for the Rubber Manufacturing Industry.

Negri, E, G Piolatto, E Pira, A Decarli, J Kaldor, and C LaVecchia. 1989. Cancer mortality in a northern Italian cohort of rubber workers. Br J Ind Med 46:624–628.

Norseth, T, A Anderson, and J Giltvedt. 1983. Cancer incidence in the rubber industry in Norway. Scand J Work Environ Health 9:69–71.

Nutt, A. 1976. Measurement of some potentially hazardous materials in the atmosphere of rubber factories. Environ Health Persp 17:117–123.

Parkes, HG, CA Veys, JAH Waterhouse, and A Peters. 1982. Cancer mortality in the British rubber industry. Br J Ind Med 39:209–220.

Peters, JM, RR Monson, WA Burgess, and LJ Fine. 1976. Occupational disease in the rubber industry. Environ Health Persp 17:31–34.

Solionova, LG and VB Smulevich. 1991. Mortality and cancer incidence in a cohort of rubber workers in Moscow. Scand J Work Environ Health 19:96–101.

Sorahan, R, HG Parkes, CA Veys, and JAH Waterhouse. 1986. Cancer mortality in the British rubber industry 1946–80. Br J Ind Med 43:363–373.

Sorahan, R, HG Parkes, CA Veys, JAH Waterhouse, JK Straughan, and A Nutt. 1989. Mortality in the British rubber industry 1946–85. Br J Ind Med 46:1–11.

Szeszenia-Daborowaska, N, U Wilezynska, T Kaczmarek, and W Szymezak. 1991. Cancer mortality among male workers in the Polish rubber industry. Polish Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health 4:149–157.

Van Ert, MD, EW Arp, RL Harris, MJ Symons, and TM Williams. 1980. Worker exposures to chemical agents in the manufacture of rubber tires: Solvent vapor studies. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 41:212–219.

Wang, HW, XJ You, YH Qu, WF Wang, DA Wang, YM Long, and JA Ni. 1984. Investigation of cancer epidemiology and study of carcinogenic agents in the Shanghai rubber industry. Cancer Res 44:3101–3105.

Weiland, SK, KA Mundt, U Keil, B Kraemer, T Birk, M Person, AM Bucher, K Straif, J Schumann, and L Chambless. 1996. Cancer mortality among workers in the German rubber industry. Occup Environ Med 53:289–298.

Williams, TM, RL Harris, EW Arp, MJ Symons, and MD Van Ert. 1980. Worker exposure to chemical agents in the manufacture of rubber tires and tubes: Particulates. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 41:204–211.

Wolf, PH, D Andjelkovich, A Smith, and H Tyroler. 1981. A case-control study of leukemia in the U.S. rubber industry. J Occup Med 23:103–108.

Zhang, ZF, SZ Yu, WX Li, and BCK Choi. 1989. Smoking, occupational exposure to rubber and lung cancer. Br J Ind Med 46:12–15.